All human sciences are concerned

As soon as we establish that access to an extrasensory dimension should be part of the normal functioning of the human psyche, all sciences relating to the human being, built on the denial of this dimension, must be taken up taking into account the hidden component and its multiple consequences.

Everything relating to communication must be rethought taking into account a transcendent transmission of information, capable of connecting all thinking beings and capable of functioning without involving the ordinary senses. Sociology must therefore review everything that has been said about the interindividual relationship, and about the group spirit (leadership, crowd psychoses, social thought and prejudices, etc.).

Anthropology must take seriously the role of the extrasensory dimension in most so-called primitive cultures; instead of despising the natives because they commonly practiced telepathy, dream interpretation, clairvoyance or divinatory drawings, recognize that they held a superiority over explorers marked by reductionist rationalism. Instead of ignoring the issue, we must objectively analyze the functioning of these traditional societies, taking into account the deficiency of our deciphering grid.

Philosophy must also change its tune, and relate the difficulties of the metaphysical approach supposed to explain the place of man in the universe with the enormous gap represented by the loss of extrasensory perception and of the world. archetypes, etc.

The life sciences must broaden their field of research, considering not only molecular data and conventional genetics, but also possible interactions between transcendent contents and the probability of organization of infinitesimal structures based on archetypal information. This could solve the problem of the appearance of life in a very unexpected way, as already proposed by quantum theory applied at the scale of molecular biology.

Even the earth sciences could be led to consider certain geological or meteorological events as due not only to chance, but to forces which escape rational analysis, if only through the theory of synchronicity of Jung and Pauli.

In short: the transition from a reductionist paradigm to a paradigm integrating the extrasensory would result in a complete upheaval of traditional epistemology. We can understand the inertia of the scientific and cultural world in the face of such profound change, all the points of reference on which the conventional knowledge system is based being shaken up by the introduction of a dimension of reasoning hitherto hidden…