Scientific and divinatory approach

Both approaches seem a priori incompatible. The illusion comes from the fact that there is no known scientifically defined natural gateway to psychic abilities.

All attempts in the past have been the esoteric or religious fashion. The conviction was thus installed in our culture that we should renounce the scientific perspective to benefit from the contributions of the paranormal. It is not so.

Certainly, the fact of wanting to have supernatural powers is the best way to fail in this way. This presupposes a divestment of ego, thus exceeding the will to know and personal curiosity.

Ego hides in scientific certainty, or more accurately, the tendency to make of science a range of certainties. A real science is still very modest about the finality of laws it can state. All knowledge remains subject to review whenever there is any contradiction with observational facts, or other theoretical elements.

Nevertheless, empirical and rational formulation of the conditions to promote access to extrasensory perception are quite possible, provided a desire for power, security, superiority, or spiritual careerism don’t slip into it.

Similarly, analysis of the difficulties that can know a person and finding their causes, can perfectly meet the analytical approach and the psychic approach. Just do not invest in will know the answers we can deliver extrasensory perception.

We must welcome messages in an interrogation attitude, not use them to bolster one’s Ego, but to better let go when dealing with personal beliefs, cultural biases, beliefs, stereotypes everyone carries with itself.

These conditions achieve a perfect symbiosis between science and divination, which allows to move much more quickly and easily than an unilateral approach would make it possible.

Both approaches seem a priori incompatible. The illusion comes from the fact that there is no known scientifically defined natural gateway to psychic abilities.

All attempts in the past have been the esoteric or religious fashion. The conviction was thus installed in our culture that we should renounce the scientific perspective to benefit from the contributions of the paranormal. It is not so.

Certainly, the fact of wanting to have supernatural powers is the best way to fail in this way. This presupposes a divestment of ego, thus exceeding the will to know and personal curiosity.

Ego hides in scientific certainty, or more accurately, the tendency to make of science a range of certainties. A real science is still very modest about the finality of laws it can state. All knowledge remains subject to review whenever there is any contradiction with observational facts, or other theoretical elements.

Nevertheless, empirical and rational formulation of the conditions to promote access to extrasensory perception are quite possible, provided a desire for power, security, superiority, or spiritual careerism don’t slip into it.

Similarly, analysis of the difficulties that can know a person and finding their causes, can perfectly meet the analytical approach and the psychic approach. Just do not invest in will know the answers we can deliver extrasensory perception.

We must welcome messages in an interrogation attitude, not use them to bolster one’s Ego, but to better let go when dealing with personal beliefs, cultural biases, beliefs, stereotypes everyone carries with itself.

These conditions achieve a perfect symbiosis between science and divination, which allows to move much more quickly and easily than an unilateral approach would make it possible.